In The Court Of Common Pleas of Cambria County, Pennsylvania,
Criminal Division
Commonwealth No. S. A. 0007-2012 0007-2012
Summary Appeal Katherine Anne Katherine
Anne McCloskey ,
nee, Gabriel McCloskey Ross
To Hon. Norman a Krumenacher III
Comes now Katherine Anne McCloskey-Ross, pro per, pro se to argue as follows:
1) So many discrepancies were found between the testimony recorded at
District Judge Varner's Court and The Court of Common Pleas sitting at
Johnstown that the defendant requests a new trial.
2) One simple example should suffice. Before you Sgt. Martin testified
that I said I "came to raise the devil" but at District Judge level he
testified just as earnestly that " He ( sic ) said he didn't come to
raise the devil"
3) If were the only change of testimony it would be of little
consequence, but their are dozens of changes which will be on the USB
stick submitted to the Court along with the video.
4) All prosecution witnesses testified that the defendant's head was not
deliberately shoved by Cheif Grady and Sargent Martin into the door,
but at 5:56 of the video submitted as evidence, it is plain this untrue.
5) The defendant does not want to charge Chief Grady and Sgt. Martin
with perjury and ADA Bernstein with subornation of perjury and prefers a
new trial were these individuals can re-evaluate what they said.
6) After 7 days the defendant will assume the Court prefers criminal charges to a new trail.
Respectfully Submitted, subject to penalties for unsworn falsification
Dr. Katherine Anne McCloskey-Ross
No comments:
Post a Comment