Translate

Thursday, May 24, 2012

In The Court Of Common Pleas of Cambria County, Pennsylvania,
Criminal Division 

Commonwealth                                                                              No. S. A.  0007-2012                                                                                      0007-2012
                                                                                                       Summary Appeal Katherine Anne  Katherine Anne McCloskey ,                               
nee, Gabriel  McCloskey Ross

To Hon. Norman a Krumenacher III 

Comes now Katherine Anne McCloskey-Ross, pro per, pro se to argue as follows:

1) So many discrepancies were found between the testimony recorded at District Judge Varner's Court and The Court of Common Pleas sitting at Johnstown that the defendant requests a new trial.  

2)  One simple example should suffice. Before you Sgt. Martin testified that  I said I "came to raise the devil" but at District Judge level he testified just as earnestly that " He ( sic ) said he didn't come to raise the devil"                     

3) If were the only change of testimony it would be of little consequence, but their are dozens of changes which will be on the USB stick submitted to the Court along with the video.

4) All prosecution witnesses testified that the defendant's head was not deliberately shoved by Cheif Grady and Sargent Martin into the door, but at 5:56 of the video submitted as evidence, it is plain this untrue.

5) The defendant does not want to charge Chief Grady and Sgt. Martin with perjury and ADA Bernstein with subornation of perjury and prefers a new trial were these individuals can re-evaluate what they said.

6) After 7 days the defendant will assume the Court prefers criminal charges to a new trail.

Respectfully Submitted,  subject to penalties for unsworn falsification

Dr. Katherine Anne McCloskey-Ross   

No comments:

Post a Comment